Constructing The Understanding of Non-Positivist Research Paradigm and Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ijabs.2022.30.1.771Keywords:
Constructing, Non-Positivist, ParadigmAbstract
Purpose—This research aims to build an understanding of non-positivist research paradigms and methods. The development of problems in society, especially those related to social problems, is increasingly complex.
Design/methodology/approach - This research used an interpretive paradigm approach. The interpretive approach departs from efforts to seek explanations of social or cultural events based on the perspectives and experiences of the people being studied.
Findings - The result of this research showed that the six paradigms that have been described, namely 1) Interpretive, 2) Phenomenology, 3) Symbolic Interactionism, 4) Critic, 5) Postmodernist, and 6) Spiritualist, have differences in their respective advantages and disadvantages.
Practical implications - The focus of each existing paradigm is also different, so researchers must be careful when using it. Differences can start from how to focus the research theme to be explored to how the report pattern should be made. Thus, these developments may lead researchers to solve increasingly complex problems and find the root of the problem.
References
Burrell G., Morgan. G. (1979). Sociological Paradigm and Organizational Analysis, Element of the Sociology of Corporate Life. England: Heinemann.
Chua, WF 1986. Radical Development in Accounting Thought. The Accounting Review LXI
Ilham, I. (2018). Postmodernism Paradigm; Solution For Social Life? USK Journal of Sociology (Media Thought & Applications), 12(1), 1–23.
Knuuttila, MLK, et al, 2008. Straddling Between Paradigms: A Naturalistic Philosophical Case Study On Interpretive Research In Management Accounting. Accounting Organizations, and Society, Vol 33 (2008) 267–291
Leniwati, D., Sukoharsono, EG, Prihatiningtias, YW, & Purwanti, L. (2020). The Sufficient Sense: The Value on the Concept of Income Based on Neuro-Psychological-Spiritual Methodology. 144(Afbe 2019), 297–305.https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200606.052
Littlejohn, Stephen, W. 2004. Theories of Human Communication. New York, USA: Artists Right Society (ARS). Theories of Human Communication (seventh edition). Belmont: Thomson Learning. Thing. 144-162
Ludigdo, 2007. Paradox of Accountant Ethics, Student Library, Yogyakarta
Muhajir, N. 2000. Qualitative Research Methodology. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin
Muslim. 2016. Variants of Paradigms, Approaches, Methods, and Types of Research in Communication Science. Journal of Wahana Communication Science Program, Pakuan University. Volume 1. Number 10. Pages 77-85.
Mulyana, Deddy. 2006. Qualitative Research Methodology, New Paradigm of Communication and Other Social Sciences. Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth.
Nelson. D. Lindsey. 1998. Herbert Blumer's Symbolic Interactionism. University of Colorado at Boulder Spring. http://www.colorado.edu/ Communication /metadiscourses/Papers/ App_Papers/Nelson.htm
Nurhayati. 2015. Describing Accounting with an Interpretive Brush. Journal of Islamic Business and Management. Volume 3, Number 1. pp. 174-191
Ryadi, A. (2004). Postmodernism versus modernism. Studia Philosophica et Theologica, 4(2), 90–100
Setiawan, J., & Sudrajat, A. (2018). Postmodernism Thought And Its View On Science. Journal of Philosophy, 28(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.33296
Smith, Jonathan A., Flowers, Paul., and Larkin. Michael. 2009. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington: Sage.
Smith, Jonathan A. (ed.). 2009. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Translation of Qualitative Psychology A Practical Guide to Research Method. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Soeprapto, Riyadi. 2002. Symbolic Interaction, Modern Sociological Perspective. Yogyakarta: Averrpes Press and Student Library.
Sugiyono. 2013. Educational Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Approaches. Bandung: Alphabeta.
Sukoharsono, Eko Ganis. 1995. Accounting, Colonial Capitalists, and Liberal Order: The Case of Accounting History in Indonesia during the Dutch Colonial of the Mid-to-End of the 19th Century, The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, Vol. 3/1
Sukoharsono, Eko Ganis. 2008. Religion, Spirituality, and Philosophy: How Do They Work For An Accounting World? The 3rd Postgraduate Consortium in Accounting: Socio-Spiritual …, Postgraduate Program University of Brawijaya, 8-9 September.
Sukoharsono, Eko Ganis. 2009. Spiritual Intelligence Definitions: Availability for Accounting Knowledge. Unpublished Working Paper. Faculty of Economics. University of Brawijaya
Sukoharsono, Eko Ganis. 2018. Strategies to Improve the Sustainability in Promoting Transparency, Accountability and Anti-Corruption: An Imaginary Dialogue. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society. Vol.26. No. 1. August.
Sukoharsono, EG (2020). Industrial Revolution 4 . 0 and the Development of Accounting Information System : An Imaginary Dialogue. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 9(2), 474–479.
Triyuwono, Iwan. 2006. Perspective, Methodology, and Accounting Theory Syahriah. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Triyuwono, Iwan. 2013. Makrifat Qualitative And Quantitative Research Methods For The Development Of Accounting Disciplines.” Manado 16th National Accounting Symposium, no. 1–15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles.
